Skip to main content

Morning Update

This morning the major data point released was jobless claims, which came in at 388K versus 365K consensus and 339K last week. US stock futures have since sold off, erasing modest overnight gains. Though this report is a disappointing 39K increase over last week, it is important to remember that last week’s number was unusually good and could have been the result of incomplete data from a state.

Five days ago the iShares FTSE China 25 ETF, FXI, gapped up over two percent through its 200-day moving average and has rallied ever since. Yesterday we noticed unusual options activity in the ETF. With the underlying at 37.23, one trader sold 20,000 Jan. 34/38 strangles and bought 30,000 Jan. 25 puts, for a net credit of $3.63 million. The core of this position is the 34/38 short strangle, which is a spread that benefits when implied volatility declines and the underlying market moves sideways. However, short strangles have unlimited risk, so this trader hedged themselves by buying deep out of the money puts to limit risk on the downside in the event of a black swan event. This spread will be profitable if FXI is between 32.18 and 39.82 at Jan. expiration in 92 days. These breakeven points are close to the ETF’s 52-week high and low, which could act as support and resistance and help to keep FXI in its range.

Because this spread is unhedged on the upside and could produce potentially unlimited losses should FXI rally hard into expiration, I will be on the sidelines for this one. At better trade in mp opinion would be to turn this into an iron condor by buying calls at a higher strike than was sold. This will reduce potential absolute returns but also reduce margin and therefore can actually increase return on investment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is the KCJ Foreshadowing a 2008 Repeat?

The CBOE Correlation Index (KCJ) is close to the lowest level we have seen since it was first listed in 2007. The KCJ measures the implied movement of the S&P 500 components options, compared to the implied movement of the S&P 500 index options. Simply put, the higher the number, the more likely all stocks are going to move together. Conversely, a low number will be characterized by sector rotation, and flat markets; one sector moves higher, another moves lower.  (Source: Access Hollywood) Correlation, for lack of a better term, is correlated with volatility. Not surprisingly, 30-day S&P 500 historical volatility is near the low level of 6.5%. Currently at 33.5, KCJ is sitting close to rock bottom, lower than where it was in 2007, (but not lower than where Lindsay Lohan was in 2007).  So far this year, the market has been able to grind higher, characterized by leadership in FANG(Facebook Apple/Amazon, Netflix, Google) and sector rotation. A...

The Week in Review

One of the questions I get most from clients is how to generate yield when the Fed is on hold with rates at zero. For a while many defensive clients were content receiving their 3% annual yield from Treasury bonds, but the Fed’s most recent meeting minutes shows that the Fed’s pace of bond buying may soon slow. While I do not think tapering is likely before year end (unless economic data accelerates significantly) the bond market is forward looking and already beginning to price tapering in. Smaller Fed purchases of Treasury bonds will mean that bond yields go up and bond prices go down. Bonds have been in a multi-year bull market, and we may now be on the cusp of a multi-year bear market. The most important indicator to watch is the 10-year yield, which cracked the 2.10% level this week for the first time in a year. If we continue to hold above 2.05% in June, the top is likely in for bonds and borrowing rates will be on the rise for everyone, including the US Treasury. So, how am ...