Skip to main content

Bridgewater is making a huge put buy in the S&P 500 for early 2020, Id like to take a moment and dive into what exactly is going on from a volatility perspective.   Consider this chart comparing the S&P 500 total return (which includes dividends) vs VIX.  Over the last 4 months or so the stock market has gone on to make new highs and the VIX is actually up during that time. 



Typically, the VIX will move lower when the S&P 500 moves higher as fear subsides when the market rallies.  Historically, when I have seen this phenomenon occur where both VIX and SPX increase in value at the same time, it has been a warning sign for stocks. I’m not predicting a global financial meltdown, but this did happen leading up to the last recession.   




Take a look at the first April to aug in 2007, which is what led up to the top on Aug 15 2007.  The reason being is that the stock market’s torrid pace higher with each pull back only lasting a few days max has made it easy now for option traders to spend a little on option premiums  but remain long the market because the cost is so little relative to the upside payoff of being long stocks.  

Whether the Bridgewater hedge works or not, I think they are seeing an opportunity to spend very little, 1% like the article says, and protect 2/3 of the funds assets because option prices have become cheap.  If the VIX/SPX positive correlation is predicting a major selloff, then hedgers like Bridgewater are taking advantage of cheap prices and yet they still can win to the upside if the market continues in a straight direction up.  Because the market is not trending sideways to slightly down and like you said maybe some volatility ahead, they are seeing solid risk/reward opportunity.  To quote “White Men Can’t Jump”, “Sometimes when you lose you really win.”  In this case, spend and lose a little on option premium to win to the upside on your long stock and maybe also win by being protected in case you lose on your stocks.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the KCJ Foreshadowing a 2008 Repeat?

The CBOE Correlation Index (KCJ) is close to the lowest level we have seen since it was first listed in 2007. The KCJ measures the implied movement of the S&P 500 components options, compared to the implied movement of the S&P 500 index options. Simply put, the higher the number, the more likely all stocks are going to move together. Conversely, a low number will be characterized by sector rotation, and flat markets; one sector moves higher, another moves lower.  (Source: Access Hollywood) Correlation, for lack of a better term, is correlated with volatility. Not surprisingly, 30-day S&P 500 historical volatility is near the low level of 6.5%. Currently at 33.5, KCJ is sitting close to rock bottom, lower than where it was in 2007, (but not lower than where Lindsay Lohan was in 2007).  So far this year, the market has been able to grind higher, characterized by leadership in FANG(Facebook Apple/Amazon, Netflix, Google) and sector rotation. A...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Week in Review

One of the questions I get most from clients is how to generate yield when the Fed is on hold with rates at zero. For a while many defensive clients were content receiving their 3% annual yield from Treasury bonds, but the Fed’s most recent meeting minutes shows that the Fed’s pace of bond buying may soon slow. While I do not think tapering is likely before year end (unless economic data accelerates significantly) the bond market is forward looking and already beginning to price tapering in. Smaller Fed purchases of Treasury bonds will mean that bond yields go up and bond prices go down. Bonds have been in a multi-year bull market, and we may now be on the cusp of a multi-year bear market. The most important indicator to watch is the 10-year yield, which cracked the 2.10% level this week for the first time in a year. If we continue to hold above 2.05% in June, the top is likely in for bonds and borrowing rates will be on the rise for everyone, including the US Treasury. So, how am ...
2 comments
Read more